It's not my field, it's not my field. WTH you are a GB member. It's
not your field but he want the elders in the congregation to handle
the whole field.
.
https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-study/636f01a5-50db-4b59-a35e-a24ae07fb0ad/case-study-29,-july-2015,-sydney.
It's not my field, it's not my field. WTH you are a GB member. It's
not your field but he want the elders in the congregation to handle
the whole field.
i thought at the end, stewart made brilliant use of scripture (about establishing fornication or other sexually immoral practises) how, in such a clever way stewart used scripture to point out that some one could basically stake out someone's house to see if a person stayed over night be they homosexual or heterosexual............that on the basis of a sort of stakeout, the two witness rule was ambivalent yet it prevailed.
due to sufficient suspicion.. and therefore why did this "suspicion" not prevail with child sexual abuse.
It's been a while since I heard a GB member speak and I feel sorry for the guy.
Why, because delusion from the top down. He really believe he is a Bible scholar.
.
https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-study/636f01a5-50db-4b59-a35e-a24ae07fb0ad/case-study-29,-july-2015,-sydney.
i thought at the end, stewart made brilliant use of scripture (about establishing fornication or other sexually immoral practises) how, in such a clever way stewart used scripture to point out that some one could basically stake out someone's house to see if a person stayed over night be they homosexual or heterosexual............that on the basis of a sort of stakeout, the two witness rule was ambivalent yet it prevailed.
due to sufficient suspicion.. and therefore why did this "suspicion" not prevail with child sexual abuse.
i thought at the end, stewart made brilliant use of scripture (about establishing fornication or other sexually immoral practises) how, in such a clever way stewart used scripture to point out that some one could basically stake out someone's house to see if a person stayed over night be they homosexual or heterosexual............that on the basis of a sort of stakeout, the two witness rule was ambivalent yet it prevailed.
due to sufficient suspicion.. and therefore why did this "suspicion" not prevail with child sexual abuse.
There will be no women elders in this system, but I must say Jackson handle
himself well . He did make the point they are open to changes and isn't
that is what it is all about, drop the two witness crap.
we all know that jws don't vote, but hypothetically, who would jehovah or the gb vote for and why?.
Donald Trump. He speaks without thinking, everyone is below him especially
women and he would be a great GB member..
i am wondering if there are any pro-jw blogs/sites that any of you visit and whether or not jws are aware of what is going on in australia.
also, what is there reaction to it?
(i may already know the answer to that last question.
We think JW's are delusional, they are not because they know the answer to every
damn question.
yesterday an e-mail.
your email has been passed to the rc case study 29.. as you may be aware the rc has announced that it anticipates hearing from.
mr g. jackson a member of the gb.
yesterday an e-mail.
your email has been passed to the rc case study 29.. as you may be aware the rc has announced that it anticipates hearing from.
mr g. jackson a member of the gb.
The first one ""thank you for your support and interest".
Kind regards, Angus Stewart SC.